YouthNet blog
An insight into youth issues, volunteering trends, charity life and more from the UK charity YouthNet
All | Events | Youth | Technology | Volunteering | YouthNet | Charity World
Friday Jun 27, 2008
Do CRB checks deter volunteers?
Yesterday think-tank Civitas published a report that said adults are afraid to interact with children for fear of being labelled as paedophiles.
The Home Office rebuffed the report saying that there was no evidence that vetting deterred volunteers, and that CRBs had stopped 20,000 unsuitable people from gaining work with vulnerable individuals.
As someone who's been involved in recruiting volunteer youth leaders over a number of years, I think Civitas have a point; and the Home Office is being naïve if it thinks that requiring people to undertake a CRB doesn't deter otherwise suitable individuals.
It's also not exactly true to say there is no evidence – NCH and Chance UK did some research last year and discovered that 1 in 5 people from BME communities are deterred by the CRB. Children's Commissioner Sir Al Aynsley-Green also told the Home Affairs select committee that potential leaders are being put off by criminal record checks.
Requiring someone to disclose their criminal past is a big ask for any organisation; especially right at the start of the process of joining. By the age of 35, 1 in 5 adults have been convicted for a crime, and of those 84% will be male. That means that nearly 1 in 3 men in the UK aged 35+ have been prosecuted or cautioned for breaking the law (Source: Hansard: Col 139, 10 Dec 1996). Most of those offences are minor and insignificant when it comes to checking the suitability of the individual; but they are still declaring something that they may have not told partners, children or even their employers.
My experience of working with volunteers who have previous convictions – albeit for petty theft and benefit fraud – is that they feel highly ashamed of having this information made available. And this is for the ones who are prepared to undertake a CRB. Others simply decide not to apply, withdraw their application, or most likely simply no longer return calls when they are asked to declare their criminal records.
20,000 unsuitable people being stopped from working with vulnerable individuals is a good thing. But at the same time there has been a significant drop in the number of adults prepared to volunteer to work with young people. This can lead to young people having less structured out-of-school activities and ultimately to them spending more time on the streets where there are none of the safeguards that a youth group has.
It's difficult to see a solution, because I'm certainly not advocating removing the requirement for CRBs as part of the recruitment of youth leaders. But continuing to deny it is a problem is not going to solve the problem of a significant lack of volunteer youth leaders in this country.
Posted by Olly Benson ( 8:59 AM ) Link to this post Comments[13]

I think the CRB process is hugely improved and I gather is being updated again at the moment. My own experience of offering to volunteer for a youth service a few years ago when I had recently moved to Chester was that they simply didn't phone back - despite knowing I had moved there to set up a national youth programme! (well they did a year later by which time I wasn't interested). It shouldn't be too difficult to reassure people what CRB checks are and aren't and that the information received is confidential.
I think theres been a trend in recent years to professionalise work with young people to the extent that its offputting to volunteers and for the few that do volunteer they enter a world of snobbery about qualifications, pay scales, jargon & so on. In my eyes volunteers are one of the most important assets youth groups can have and its the role of the paid staff to make their experience as comfortable and painless as possible - sadly thats not always what I see.
Posted by Mike Amos-Simpson on June 27, 2008 at 01:12 PM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by julia Fryer on July 17, 2008 at 12:51 PM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by Joan Cummings on July 17, 2008 at 01:08 PM GMT+00:00 #
Unfortuntly many people make mistakes and they are often minro but still a huge embaressment, the checks may be confidential but the people that read them to decide your suitability may be people who you will then see every time you volunteer for that organisationa and people are often too ashamed to have to face these people who know for example that when they were 19 they got arrested for shoplifting - even say 20 years on this is still something they will feel ashamed about and will have tried to put behind them and by volunteering it will all be dragged back up.
Posted by Anon on July 17, 2008 at 01:11 PM GMT+00:00 #
And the other problem which many people have is the possibility of a false allegation. I know an ex-Scout leader who won't go back to youth volunteering because he would probably loose his current job if a malicious allegation was made against him, and people who won't get involved for fear of having their own young children taken into care as a result of a spiteful allegation. I agree with your first commentator about social stigma against men who are willing to work with young people, and about the professionalisation of many formerly simple voluntary jobs.
Posted by Jenny Foster on July 17, 2008 at 01:12 PM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by Steve on July 17, 2008 at 02:22 PM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by Pedros on July 17, 2008 at 02:46 PM GMT+00:00 #
voluntary work with adults recovering from breakdowns.
I have a petty criminal record that is 30 years old & mentioned this before the check was done. I was encouraged to go ahead with it anyway only to be told
later on that it is "not our policy to take on people with
a criminal record" I have to presume that someone
had seen it & objected to one of the offences.
So not only do we have to put up with being put on the spot, we have to contend with people who believe they have the right to judge us!
It certainly put me off applying again.
Posted by B Boru on July 17, 2008 at 04:23 PM GMT+00:00 #
However, many organisations seem to be taking the 'pee' out of the system and using it to screen every volunteer irrespective of whether they interact with children and the vunerable.
The CRB check is only as good as the time it was completed, and only if offences or data are held on a person. A real issue is that the whole scenario behind the CRB process has made volunteers re-evaluate just what they are taking on when volunteering, we volunteer to do good, not to be a lamb to the slaughter and get some false accusation made against us with all the hassle that that brings.
ALSO: Noticed the number of roles that in detail are clearly paid work that the 'charitable business' owner simply won't pay someone to do...
Posted by Martin Davies on July 17, 2008 at 06:44 PM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by 10.0.0.8 on July 17, 2008 at 07:44 PM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by loraine on July 18, 2008 at 09:46 AM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by clive hart on July 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM GMT+00:00 #
Posted by jackie eccles on July 18, 2008 at 04:24 PM GMT+00:00 #