Skip to main content
 
Home Blog

YouthNet blog


An insight into youth issues, volunteering trends, charity life and more from the UK charity YouthNet

All | Events | Youth | Technology | Volunteering | YouthNet | Charity World

03282006 Tuesday Mar 28, 2006


20% cut in emissions no longer possible

The Guardian reports that today Margaret Beckett, the environment secretary, will admit that the Government's pledge to cut CO2 emissions by 20% by 2010 is no longer achievable.

The fact that Labour have pledged to reach this milestone on 3 separate occasions will no doubt be a huge embarrassment to them - quite rightly.  I'm sure there will be plenty of excuses, but the fact remains that carbon emissions are now 3% higher than they were in 1997.

However, it's not all doom and gloom. As The Independent reports, an All-Party Parliamentary Climate Change Group, led by Chairman Colin Challen, are proposing a radical change from the drive for economic growth (which results in ever increasing CO2 emissions that overwhelm the cuts created by the Government's policies), to focussing on how much carbon we can afford to emit. The system, known as  "Contraction and Convergence", would introduce carbon rationing for "carbon rich" countries, whilst allowing emissions from "carbon poor" to rise.

Of course this would mean real sacrifices for all of us, on an individual and business level, but given the situation we're in I'm not sure if we have much of choice.

Posted by Sam Thomas ( 11:10 AM ) Link to this post Comments[2]



Volunteering magazine online

Why should an organisation produce a printed magazine when they can put the same information online and save paper and the costs of print and postage?

That, presumably, was the logic behind Volunteering England's (VE) decision to put Volunteering magazine onto their website rather than publishing it conventionally. But their decision has shown some of the pitfalls of favouring new technology over old.

The biggest problem is the difficulty of translating a print magazine into an online one. VE offer a fantastic amount of material in the online Volunteering but it is presented as a list of articles rather than a navigable website, which makes for a lot of scrolling. And articles are of a length that, while easy enough to read on paper, tend to make your eyes glaze over when reading on screen. Will people bother to print articles out? One reader, at least, has posted on the VE site to say that he will not.

Because the magazine is for members only, there is a problem if you want to share an item with someone who isn't a member. Of course, it makes it far easier to share with someone who does suscribe, and you couldn't email someone a printed magazine, but search engines, forums (like UKVPMs) and users tend to like access online to be open.

Online magazines lose the many qualities that print enjoys. Magazines like The Economist and Wired continue to thrive in the digital age not just because ink and paper is easier to read, but because it is portable and easy to share.

A printed magazine also feels special. Whether it arrives on your desk or through your letterbox, it has a physical presence and status. It demands to be read in a way that an email link does not.

Posted by Tom Green ( 9:00 AM ) Link to this post



 

Our del.icio.us tags

 

Calendar

 

Hot Posts

 

RSS Feeds

 

Search Blog

 

Links

 

Alert YouthNet

 

Disclaimer